首页 软考

Technologies for the Development of Agent-based Distributed Applications[4]

软考 llq667 浏览 940

CommunicationandinteroperabilityInteroperabilitybetweendifferentvendors''agentsystemsiskeytothesuccessofmobileagentcomputing.Thesubjectcanbedividedintothreeareas:interoperabilitybetweensystemsthatuseacommonimplementationlanguage,interoperabilityacrossplatformse

Communication and interoperability

Interoperability between different vendors' agent systems is key to the success of mobile agent computing. The subject can be divided into three areas: interoperability between systems that use a common implementation language, interoperability across platforms employing different implementation languages, and communication between agents. In general, the first two concern actions like agent and class transfer, and agent management. Communication between agents is in this context to be understood as higher-level interaction between mobile agents that seek to achieve certain goals through their interaction. Without common standards for at least interoperability between different agent platforms, usage of agent systems will be limited to proprietary environments.

Security

Mobile agent systems are exposed to possible security threats including communication security threats, threats from agents (both to other agents and the host system), and malicious host attacks. Since communication security is well-understood, and numerous solutions are available, it is not investigated further here. Threats from agents partly fall within the communication security category, and partly may show as authentication problems, which can also be addressed using well-known mechanisms like certificates, etc. As will be discussed later, the built-in security features of Java make this programming platform a favorite basis for mobile agent systems because they already provide the fundamentals for protecting host systems from attacks launched by mobile code.

A more complex issue is dealing with malicious hosts that try to manipulate visiting mobile agents. As Hohl [8] points out, "existing security mechanisms are not easily applicable here since the aspect of securing a program against a malicious interpreter is a rather new aspect." Table 1 illustrates the variety and complexity of the problem.

Most authors doubt that the malicious host problem can be solved at all without the unrealistic use of secure hardware [5, 7]. However, efforts to solve the malicious host problem exist and concentrate on two areas: code obfuscation (also called "code mess-up") and mobile cryptography [11].

Code obfuscation techniques aim to hinder re-engineering of the agent's function by transforming the code and data into an unreadable form via a mechanism that cannot be inverted with the currently available knowledge. Because it is clear that this can only prolong re-engineering, but does not prevent it from being performed, code mess-up techniques need to be combined with code/data lifetime restrictions.

The goal of cryptographic approaches is to find encryption schemes for functions that the mobile code implements. As an example, assume sample user Alice wants to evaluate a linear map A on input x which can be found on the computer of a second sample user, Bob. Alice wants to keep A secret. Therefore, instead of sending Bob A, she sends him a matrix B = SA, where S is a randomly chosen invertible matrix. Bob can now perform the computation and send back Bx, which Alice can calculate the results she was interested in from by simple multiplication with the inverse of S: S -1Bx=Ax.

Platform technology

The previous section listed some problem areas mobile agent systems must address. We now examine the technological approaches to those major issues that are undertaken in state-of-the-art mobile agent platforms and discuss their advantages and disadvantages.

Java-based agent systems

With features like platform-independence, the concept of Applets, a sophisticated security model, object serialization, and RMI (Remote Method Invocation), Java seems destined as a natural agent system platform [13]. Indeed, most of the recently developed agent systems are based on Java or Java-based technologies. For example, an agent system based on Sun's Java Intelligent Network Infrastructure (JINI) has been developed at the University of Maryland [4]; JINI already provides many techniques that are important for agent systems, such as look-up services. A (necessarily incomplete) list of available Java-based systems is given in Table 2.

[1]  [2]  [3]  [4]  [5]  [6]  [7]  

责任编辑:llq667|希赛教研中心

希赛教研中心拥有一支规模200余人的专职教研团队,深耕项目管理、软考、通信工程师、金融财会、厂商认证、考博英语等方向,形成“讲师+助教+班主任+智能学习平台”协同联动的完整教学服务体系:讲师讲透方法、助教盯住进度和答疑、班主任守住节奏、智能平台记录每一步成长——环环相扣,让学员的备考全程有人陪、有反馈、有结果。 师资力量雄厚。主要讲师毕业于 985/211 等知名高校,并拥有海外留学归国人才;职称梯队完善,高、中级职称讲师结构合理,讲师持有软考高级资格证书、PMI系列认证、CSPM高级项目管理培训师证、PeopleCert认证、DAMA认证、英语专八(TEM-8)、PETS-5、华为HCIE、经济师、一级建造师等行业权威资质,兼具深厚理论功底与丰富实战经验。 教研成果卓越。教研团队成员深度参与多项国家标准的研制工作,是 GB/T 47282-2026《项目重大节点评审规范》、GB/T 47285-2026《项目商业分析指南》、GB/T 30339-2026《项目和项目群后评价指南》、GB/T 46210-2025《项目成本管理指南》等国家标准的主要起草人,并担任《中国项目管理知识体系指南》总体编写专家组成员。团队累计主编出版专业图书与教材一百多种,覆盖软考、通信工程师、PMP、CSPM、NPDP等多个认证方向。 教学成效显著。 依托希赛自主研发的开放式智能互动学习平台,团队累计服务学员超百万人,帮助众多学员顺利通过软考、 PMP、CSPM、NPDP、华为认证、通信工程师、管理类联考、考博英语等考试,大批学员考入 985、211 等知名高校深造,以专业与口碑赢得学员和行业的广泛认可。

📅 本文最后更新于 2026-04-03

温馨提示:因考试政策、内容不断变化与调整,本网站提供的以上信息仅供参考,如有异议,请考生以权威部门公布的内容为准!
题库
章节练习
章节练习
章节专项突破
模拟考场
模拟考场
海量免费试题
每日一练
每日一练
每天10题练习
习题练习
习题练习
核心知识点练习
高频错题
高频错题
错题突破集训
分享至