专注在线职业教育23年
下载APP
小程序
希赛网小程序
导航

预约成功后,不错过重要时期

点击预约

2016年武汉大学考博英语真题3

责编:王觅 2019-01-22
考博英语资料领取

希赛网英语考试频道为大家分享“2016年武汉大学考博英语真题3(阅读理解)”,更多考博英语相关信息,请关注希赛网英语考试频道。

Passage Three

“A HARMLESS drudge, Of the definitions in Samuel Johnson’s great English dictionary of 1755,that of “lexicographer”,his own calling, is the most famous, an example of the same wit that led him to define “oats” as “a grain, which in England is generally given to horses, but in Scotland supports the people’,.

Why name a language column after a harmless drudge? Because Johnson, despite the drudgery, knew that language was not harmless. Its power to inform and to lead astray, to entertain and to annoy, to build co-operation or destroy a reputation, makes language serious stuff, The Economist’s “Johnson” column began in 1992 and was later revived online. This week it returns to the print edition, and henceforth will appear fortnightly.

Many of the topics tackled are fun: swearing and slang, preferences and peeves. Some are more fundamental. Language reveals a lot about human nature: how people reason differently in a foreign language, or to what extent different languages encode a world view, are some of the most exciting and controversial topics in linguistic research. People care intensely about their language, and so language in the wider world sometimes comes into conflict. The perceived arrogance of Castilians to Catalan threatens to sunder Spain; “language police” in Quebec tell restaurant owners to change “pasta” and “grilled cheese” pates and fromae fondant. At the extreme, the passage of a law downgrading Russian in Ukraine helps spark war in that country ; Vladimir Putin has used it as evidence that Ukrainian nationalists are bent on wiping out

Russian culture there. The war has rumbled on since, with language the most obvious symbol of wider identity and sympathy.

So the Johnson column treats topics light and heavy as well as language both English and international. A language column is expected to tackle questions of right and wrong. There are roughly two views of how to do this: one top-down, based on authority, prestige, writing and stability; one bottom-up, resting on how most people actually use the language, and open to change.

The two schools of thought, known as “prescriptivism” ( which sets down how the language should be) and “ descriptivism” ( which tells how it is ) , have often been at daggers drawn: English teachers and some usage-book writers on one side, and academic linguists, lexicographers

and other usage-book writers on the other. In the caricature, prescriptivists are authoritarians with their heads in the sand, insisting on Victorian-era non-rules. The descriptivists are mocked as “ anything-is-correct ’’,embracing every fad,even that Shakespeare should be taught in text-message-speak.

An intellectual writing for an elite audience, Samuel Johnson did not shy away from “right” and “wrong”,even “barbarity”,“depravity” and “corruption”,in matters of language. But he declared his task was not to “form” but to “register” (that is, describe) the language; trying to stop change was like trying to “ lash the wind”. Above all, his years of drudging at the dictionary had taught him humility: he knew he was sure to commit “ a few wild blunders, and visible absurdities, from which no work of such multiplicity was ever free”.

Prescribing is not really the opposite of describing. Lexicographers from Johnson’s day on must describe the language, grounding their definitions in real living English. But that is in order to give stronger roots to a book they know people will use for firm guidance. Academic linguists, the arch-descriptivists, are perfectly willing to call some usages wrong and others plain ugly.

9. Which of the following is INCORRECT about Samuel Johnson according to the passage?

A. Samuel Johnson once compiled a great English dictionary.

B. Samuel Johnson defined oats as a grain which is generally given to horses in England but supports the people in Scotland.

C. Samuel Johnson defined lexicographer as a harmless drudge.

D. Samuel Johnson knew that language was harmless.

10. Why is language serious stuff according to the passage?

A. It has power to inform and to lead astray.

B. It has power to entertain and to annoy.

C. It has power to build cooperation or destroy a reputation.

D. All of the above.

11. From Para 4, the author has listed the conflicts caused by language in the following countries EXCEPT .

A. Ukraine B. Canada C. Quebec D. Spain

12. Which of the following is NOT MENTIONED in the passage?

A. The Economist’s “Johnson” column begun in 1992 treats different topics in different languages.

B. Both prescriptivists and descriptivists are mocked in the academic articles.

C. Trying to stop change in language was like trying to “lash the wind”.

D. Lexicographers from Johnson’s day on must ground their definitions in real living English.

考博英语自学神器武汉大学-希赛学习包

版权辅导教材+推荐自学计划+在线智能题库+知识点练习+入群共同学习+1-2年服务期

考博英语培训课程武汉大学-希赛课程

结合历年考试真题,辅以相关理论知识,以轻松、简化的语言教授,让学生迅速掌握知识点及做题技巧。

小编推荐:

历年武汉大学考博英语真题汇总

>>点击注册会员,享更多英语考试相关资料

素材来源:网络

更多资料
更多课程
更多真题
温馨提示:因考试政策、内容不断变化与调整,本网站提供的以上信息仅供参考,如有异议,请考生以权威部门公布的内容为准!
相关阅读
查看更多

加群交流

公众号

客服咨询

考试资料

每日一练